Friday, August 27, 2010

Enact privacy act to protect personal information

'Enact privacy act to protect personal information'

Staff Correspondent

Friday, August 27, 2010 Metropolitan

Speakers at a roundtable discussion yesterday called upon the government to enact a privacy act to protect privacy, personal information, correspondence and means of communication of people.

They pointed out that individual privacy is a constitutional right of every citizen and yet it is being violated at every step of everyone's life and no one can take legal actions against such violation.

The discussion titled "Privacy rights and citizen's concerns" was organised by VOICE in association with Privacy International at the Cirdap auditorium in the city.

"Article 43 of the constitution says every citizen shall have the right to privacy of his correspondence and other means of communication," said Ahmed Swapan Mahmud, executive director of VOICE, a rights-based organisation.

Now there is no means to ensure this right to the citizens, he said.

"We get phone calls from superstores, marketing firms, and other organisations who are not supposed to have our contact information," said Mahmud, "and yet they have our names, phone numbers and family information-- all without our consent."

Journalist Selim Samad said phones are tapped in the name of security, emails are scrutinised and correspondences are monitored by security agencies.

"We even had to give our fingerprints to the state for the national identity card. These are nothing but criminalising the society," he said.

"Only convicted criminals in the US are required to give their fingerprints to the state," said journalist Shahidul Shuvra. "But here in Bangladesh, every citizen is required to give their fingerprints for the national identity card. This is blatant violation of individual privacy," he said.

In return for providing the state with information, the citizens are not receiving any kind of benefits as well, the discussants said.

"For example, if someone threatens you over telephones and you post a complaint to the law enforcers, they would not be able to take any action because they would not be able track the callers," he said.

The real problem lies in the society's mindset where no one is aware of rights to individual privacy, said journalist Selim Samad.

Our children are brought up in an environment where they are not given any privacy or individual freedom. So, they do not understand the value of privacy, said the discussants.

They said information is an asset and it needs to be protected.

In a country where the state is unable to protect its information from other countries, it is difficult to ensure protection of individual privacy and personal information, the discussants added.

Courtesy_

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

The RTI Act was passed by the Lok Sabha (Lower House) on 11 May 2005, by the Raj Sabha (Upper House) on 12 May 2005 and received Presidential assent on 15 June 2005. Parts of the Act came into force upon Presidential assent, but the Act came fully into force on 12 October 2005, 120 days after Presidential assent.

Search our Blog

Google
 

Subscribe this Blog to your E-mail


Disclaimer

This Blog Spot is meant for publishing reports about the usage of RTI Act (Right to Information Act, 2005) so as to create an awareness to the general public and also to keep it as a ready reckoner by them. So the readers may extend their gratitude towards the Author as we quoted at the bottom of each Post under the title "Courtesy".Furthermore, the Blog Authors are no way responsible for the correctness of the materials published herein and the readers may verify the concerned valuable sources.

Dinamani - RTI News